How Conzent compares

Fifty-two honest, fact-checked comparisons against the cookie consent platforms teams switch from. Same questions every time: what it costs, what's included, and what happens when you outgrow the free tier.

Pick who you're comparing against

Every page below covers the same ground: pricing, IAB TCF and Google Consent Mode v2 support, CMS coverage, self-hosting, EU data residency, enterprise readiness (verified accessibility, outage behaviour, audit evidence, DPAs) and what actually happens when you switch. We link straight to each vendor's own pricing where we can, and flag anywhere their public information was unclear or unconfirmed — no invented numbers. Where a competitor is the better fit, we say so on its page.

One pattern holds across almost all of them: the affordable tools have no answer when an audit asks about accessibility conformance, outage behaviour or a self-hosted exit, and the enterprise suites answer only behind a sales call. Conzent is built to be the third option — the enterprise answers on public pricing, with an open-source core. That's what Conzent for enterprise documents in one place.

The ones teams switch from most

Website and agency platforms

Conzent vs CookieFirst

IAB TCF sits on the €19 Plus plan, and billing is per domain. Conzent includes TCF everywhere.

Conzent vs CookieHub

Metered by session — neither pageviews nor visitors, and the hardest unit to forecast before you sign.

Conzent vs Cookie Script

Auto-blocking, consent recording and TCF are the upsell, and the price multiplies per domain.

Conzent vs Cookie Tractor

It refuses to meter visitors, then meters pages instead — so a catalogue or a third language moves you up.

Conzent vs CookiePal

Three different published answers to what the free tier actually is, and Advanced Consent Mode on Pro.

Conzent vs Cookifi

Cheap to start, metered by events — a number most marketing teams don't track.

Conzent vs TRUENDO

Two meters running at once: per domain per year, plus a charge per unique visitor.

Conzent vs Axeptio

Axeptio's free tier caps at 200 visitors/month; Conzent's self-hosted option has no cap at all.

Conzent vs Secure Privacy

Every domain needs its own licence at the same level, so the headline price multiplies quietly.

Conzent vs UniConsent

A fair, well-built CMP with a double meter — monthly users and a site cap per plan.

Conzent vs Acceptrics

A genuinely generous free tier and simple metering — but nothing past the banner is published.

Conzent vs Concord

Three meters at once: sessions, domains, and a monthly privacy-request quota you don't control.

Conzent vs Consent Studio

The €10 headline is a base fare — languages, geotargeting and integrations are charged separately.

Conzent vs Gravito

A capable Nordic publisher CMP with a floor under it: €150/month before any traffic at all.

Conzent vs Clym

Priced per website and capped by pageviews, and the per-site price never falls as you add sites.

Conzent vs Webtru

Japan-first and genuinely right for Japanese traffic; the free plan stops at 1,000 requests.

Conzent vs Adopt

Priced in banner slots rather than traffic, with the compliance detail left unpublished.

WordPress and CMS plugins

Shopify apps

Conzent has no Shopify integration, so these three pages are written for one situation only: you run a storefront and other sites, and you're deciding what covers the rest of the estate. If Shopify is all you have, stay where you are — each page says so.

Enterprise and publisher platforms

Policy generators with a banner attached

Don't see the tool you're switching from? Tell us and we'll look into it.

See what it actually costs, per site.

Public pricing, no sales call — or self-host Conzent's OCI for free, forever.